Submitting Your Writing

Fiction

Nonfiction

Poetry

Articles

Motion Picture Writing

Young Writers

HOME

Dethroning the Gods of the Religions, p. 3

It should be noted at once that the Gods of the religions - including the ancestral and tribal Gods - represent or demonstrate in general, not omniscience as they typically claim for themselves - but the average of the humanity that they control, both in terms of intelligence and character. This observation holds the key to uncovering their real identity. Their existence arises out of a collective psychological condition of dependency and fear which presupposes the mind-body split - and their characteristics are precisely limited by the qualities inherent in this milieu.

The causal mechanism by which such quasi-entities arise will be examined in detail below, but to properly understand the phenomenology of this process the following key principle must always be borne in mind. At the very moment that man’s primordial link to consciousness itself and to the life-current of the universe becomes severed, the mass mind is formed and arises. This causal relationship is direct. The Gods of the religions are a special class of psychic entity that arise solely in relation to and in the context of the mass mind; they never arise to an individual that has realized its immediate link to reality. Such entities are a unique and invariable characteristic that is inseparable from the conditions associated with the specific structure of mass psychology. These two forms of consciousness, the collectivist and that of the realized, self-originated individual, are precisely the basis for the distinction between the solar and lunar religions that has been developed elsewhere [6].

According to the theories of modern western psychology the mind is merely an effect or an epiphenomenon of biology or of matter; it does not arise in the context of an environment that is continuous with its own order of reality, that is to say, a cosmic meta-domain of mind exactly as the body arises in the contextual domain of the physical world. Consequently the traditional conception of God is regarded by this psychology as merely a projection of man’s fear’s and hopes and is reducible to them.

However, from the standpoint of a non-reductionist perspective in which the physical world is a dimension within the cosmic meta-domain of the psyche things appear otherwise. While the genesis of the religious Gods does require a mass psychology of dependency they are not merely subjective hallucinations. They arise as symbiotic dimensional entities that have no independent existence from the psychic energy of the collectivity from which they draw their power. The relationship between such Gods and the groups in which and on which they live is not merely parasitic, it is reciprocal and hence symbiotic. Because such Gods are inserted in a subtle dimension of the world-process that is in reality psychophysical in nature they are associated with or can acquire influence over certain of the elemental forces of the natural world and bring about real effects of a purely external order on behalf of their votaries.

Having defined the class of entities to which the religious Gods belong we can now examine their genesis and the functional mechanisms by which they operate which we will illustrate with examples drawn from the so-called Semitic religions - Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

In the Cosmic Origins of Species it was shown that existence has no contrary and therefore no cause: nonexistence does not exist otherwise it would be something and therefore cannot antecede or have caused existence. Likewise consciousness is always the case, it cannot be derived from what is not conscious; therefore it is uncaused and unoriginated. Finally Life is energy, therefore radiation. It follows that manifest Life must always be the case since non-manifestation is not a possibility of what is by its very nature radiant. Therefore, existence as such always and everywhere exists in eternal duration, it has no beginning and no end and in this respect we agree with Aristotle. There is no Creator of the universe or of any universe. All universes are macrobeings that reproduce themselves in generations exactly as all living being reproduce themselves in generations. Every universe contains the seeds of succeeding universes and reproduce themselves in endless beginningless duration.

In the face of this evidence the Gods of the religions invariably claim to be the omnipotent creators, maintainers and destroyers of the universe and of man. This claim is false: no God created the universe and claims of omniscience, omnipotence, omnipresence and the like by religious Gods can be rigorously shown to be superstitious nonsense on the basis of both logical and empirical evidence. Throughout the course of human history thousands of Gods have claimed to be the creator of the universe by means of an enormous variety of mechanisms; all of these divergent claims cannot be true because none of them is true.

In order to project its absoluteness and omnipotence and thereby gain the total allegiance and unconditional subservience of its devotees, every God must make time and space begin with itself and claim to be in control of every force and particle in the universe. A mere glance at the history of the world in general and of the religions in particular- given their reciprocal ostracisms, their internal contradictions and the strictly limited scope of their influence and expansion - renders such claims obvious nonsense. The proposition of a transcendent unity of religions - of a single source of their emanation - entertained by certain metaphysical systems is not supported by any facts. Religious sectarianism has directly or indirectly been the single greatest cause of bigotry, murder, treachery, narrowness, stupidity and deception far exceeding every other cause in the history of man.

On the contrary what is clear is that the Gods exhibit both the best and the worst characteristics of every human collectivity attached to them. This is necessarily the case since they are symbiotic entities which, through the worship and ritual acts of its votaries, progressively accumulate power by absorbing the psychic constituents of its worshipers both while alive and after death. Therefore the demonstrated qualities of the Gods of the religions are entirely human, both in their weaknesses and in their strengths and give evidence of a level of intelligence that hardly ever surpasses the average of the collectivity in question.
____________________________
[6] See The Solar Body, pp. 54–56. In this connection it could be pointed out that Bolshevism which in Soviet Russia adopted an official atheist creed nonetheless replaced the God of Christianity with the deity of “the State” to which all the characteristics of the usual authoritarian God had been transferred.

Page 1 2 4 5 6 7

TOP