Submitting Your Writing

Fiction

Nonfiction

Poetry

Articles

Motion Picture Writing

Young Writers

HOME

Dethroning the Gods of the Religions, p. 4

If its powers sometimes appear superhuman, not as regards their being informed by extraordinary intelligence, but with respect to the intensity of their effects this is because of the cumulative force of both the living and the ancestral psychic elements of the collectivity that the God has at its disposal. Therefore all Gods are in their origins projected on distinct racial, tribal or nationalist lines. They have no identity apart from that given them by the collective psychism of the group to which they are attached. Even within one and the same religion one can find multiple nationalist Gods who often enter into conflict with one another and the history of Europe provides many examples of this, the saga of Joan of Arc (1412-1431) in the 100 Years War between France and England being a case in point.

Since the existence and identity of every God derives from the psychic force of its worshippers, it must at all times manipulate its worshippers to constant praise and devotion of itself and its self-proclaimed greatness and thereby convert every action of the devotee into a form of psychic dependency upon itself. Thereafter it maintains this dependency by means of systems guilt, reward and punishment. However, the God is a composite of the highest aspirations and ambitions of the mass mind which it seeks to realize and this is why the nature of the relationship between a God and its people is precisely a reciprocal symbiosis that is marked by strong tribal or nationalist narcissism [7]. Thus the religious Gods are often sincere within the context of their own unconscious limitations and can manifest qualities of protection, strength and even of love just as easily as qualities of injustice, revenge and cruelty both in relation to an outsider group and even with respect to elements within its body of worshippers that fall short of the standards of devotional energy required by the God to nourish and sustain its power.

The externalized Gods of the religions are therefore not enlightened entities and have no interest in the enlightenment of their devotees. In fact their existence and the interests of the mass mind require that the devotee have no profound understanding of the real nature of the God in question nor of himself nor of the universe and this is why the “lunar” religions of the mass mind have always been at war with the radical esoterisms that from time to time emerge in their midst and attempt to unveil them, and the critical importance of an immutable dogmatic system of knowledge, an obediential morality and social taboos. The greatest threat to the God and to the collectivity is the emergence of the conscious individual who has realized the condition of free consciousness while bodily alive, a consciousness and a realization that immensely surpasses the God and the collective mind with which he is inseparably associated.

No God is eternal since its coordinates in the terrestrial plane are precisely the collectivity of which it is a psychic composite. This composite is made up of both the psychism of those physically alive as well as the accumulated ancestral depositories of the dead as has been explained in the foregoing. Therefore, like the many Gods of the past which have ceased to exist on the terrestrial plane or entered into dormancy, the Gods of the religions cease to exist when their devotees dissipate either through attrition or through conquest and assimilation by another group. For the same reason the scope of influence and power of a given God, while being real on a certain plane, is strictly limited by the psychic possibilities of the collectivity - including all the possibilities represented by the accumulated ancestral mass - to which it is attached.

The progressive metamorphosis of the tribal God of the ancient Hebrews well illustrates many of the points that have just been made. The starting point for this metamorphosis was an encounter between Jehovah and the ambitions of a nomadic tribal group under Abraham, a convergence which led to the promise made to Abraham that he and his descendants would be exalted above all other tribes and nations and given world empire.
In the first stage of the realization of this mandate, Jehovah was no longer one tribal deity among others, he claimed to be the greatest and most powerful among them and he is proclaimed God of all gods. In the second stage of his metamorphosis he is no longer the greatest among the Gods, he now claims to be the one and only God, the Creator of the Heavens and the Earth. But true to his tribal roots in the mass mind the Jews then became the “chosen people” of this one supreme God, a people set apart and destined for world rule. The ascendancy of the one and only God now coincides with the claim to be one and only real people, the Jews. The convergence of these two claims precisely reveals the origin of Jehovah in the collective mind, certainly not his creation as such, but his existence as an exclusive supreme God.

Now, since in time it became apparent that this absurd promise of world dominion was becoming increasingly remote, Prophets arose among the Jews who perpetuated and legitimized this dangerous hallucination by explaining the failure of the fulfillment of the promise to Abraham as punishment for the recalcitrance of the people, in short, their failure to obey their God. In response to this dilemma the notion of the Messiah was invented: the Messiah would lead the Jews to the final triumphant fulfillment of the great promise whose seat would be Jerusalem. Needless to say they are still waiting for the Deliverer and so are the Christians who have inserted themselves into the drama of this collective psychosis.

Every form of national or racial narcissism in principle and in fact directly contributes to the disintegration of humanity, not its unification, and cannot form the basis of a universal civilization.
____________________________
[7] The operative mechanisms in question here can be better understood with reference to two phenomena in modern times that to one degree or another duplicate the same mechanisms. They are “channeling” and the psychic power accumulated by gurus in the context of an abusive “guru yoga” or worship of the guru. In the case of “channeling” psychic entities of various levels of intelligence and in most case not significantly surpassing that of the medium deliver messages or a philosophy whose content clearly derives from dispositions and data already contained in the subconscious of the medium and of people psychically attached to the medium and available to the entity. In the case of guru yoga, the psychic powers of an exploitative guru to a great extent derive from his learned ability to absorb the psychic force of his devotees and his power increases in proportion to the intensity of their devotion. Thus in cases where the cult becomes dismantled or weakened, the guru’s force is seen to proportionately diminish.

Page 1 2 3 5 6 7

TOP