Submitting Your Writing

Fiction

Nonfiction

Poetry

Articles

Motion Picture Writing

Young Writers

HOME

Dethroning the Gods of the Religions, p. 5

In modern times this racial or nationalist narcissism and the imperialist mythology to which it gives rise exists to one degree or another among the Japanese, Chinese, Arabs, Russians, Germans, Americans and others and it is by no means the prerogative of the Jews. Wherever it appears, its effects have been without exception disastrous, and the millennial Jewish version of it is qualitatively no different from those of other peoples merely because it has been dressed up in the garments of religion [8].

Judaism would have remained an insignificant tribal cult had it not been annexed by Christianity and thus by Europe and it was in this manner that it entered onto the world stage and achieved the status of a “great” or “world” religion. The historical vehicle for this development was the Roman Empire which had already realized the unification of the European tribal states under a single form of government centered in Rome.

Once Christianity had been adopted as the official religion of the Roman Empire in the 4th Century C.E. under the emperor Constantine the conditions for the Judaization of Europe had been established, a process that reached its ultimate term of completion with the Protestant Reformation when the Bible for the first time became directly accessible to the masses and no longer mediated through the Latin church.

Now it was Jesus the Nazarene who created the breach in the hermetically closed tribal religion of the Jews and taught a message about a universal, non-authoritarian God of love. Rabbinical Judaism declares that their religion was the first to universalize the one God. This is false. The Jewish God was and still is the one God of the “chosen people” who was “jealous” of every other God and despised other peoples whom he always sought to undermine and destroy unless they willingly submitted themselves in tribute to his favored tribe [9]. It was Jesus who attempted to universalize God beyond “the chosen people” and for this he was apparently killed by the Jews because to do this he had to claim a universal authority they refused to recognize.

A careful examination of the gospel texts suggests that the God of the Nazarene is a distinct condition of reality from the God of the Jews, which belongs to a class of entities we have identified in the foregoing. But the identification of the two resulted in the immediate destruction of the revolutionary teachings of the Nazarene and thereafter European humanity fell under the influence of yet another symbiotic authoritarian force from which came the profound retardation of the European peoples and the disaster of the so-called Middle Ages. The author of this crime was Paul of Tarsus and the ultimate consequences of his teachings were enacted into canon law by the early Councils of the Church starting with that of Ephesus in 326 CE.

For the Nazarene, the Way was to love God by the total release of the body, mind and heart into the condition of God, then to see, feel and release all beings (not merely those in one’s tribe) into that very condition through love. While this writer does not by any means endorse the teaching of the Nazarene in its totality, the foregoing could be said to be an adequate summary of its most important elements free of all dogmatic and cultic superimpositions. Moreover, he explicitly taught that the realization that was true in his own case was duplicable in its entirety by all who engaged it sincerely. Not so, according to Paul.

The new Pauline Way is principally a matter of the saving power of belief in a unique, unrepeatable event, the death and resurrection of Jesus who Paul eventually coverts into a hypostatic aspect of the one and only God of the Jews. The sole efficacy of the Way taught by Jesus was not his teaching-message nor the demonstration of his life, but his death and resurrection. The Way is not transformation of the body-mind and the world by the force of love but belief in the vicarious sacrifice of Jesus for the sins of the world. No human is qualified to practice the Way because man’s inherent and inescapable corruption requires that the only possibility open to so wretched a condition is the ransom or the substitution of the death of Jesus for everyone before “the Father”. And therefore the only guarantee left for man was the guidance of the Church and of the Bible to the alleged evidence of this one and only saving event [10].
____________________________
[8] For Rabbinical Judaism the Talmud (comprised of the Mishnah and the Gemara)—and specifically the Babylonian version which is regarded as more authoritative than the Jerusalem Talmud - is in practice superior to the Torah and even replaces it since the latter cannot be properly understood without it. The whole edifice of Jewish halakah (law) is founded on the Talmud and the premise of Jewish racial superiority which forms the basis for the Jewish claim to world supremacy while already clearly asserted in the Torah, is made explicit in the Talmud as is attested to by the following citations (all references are to the Babylonian Talmud):
“If a heathen (gentile) hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.” Sanhedrin 58b.
“A Jew need not pay a gentile the wages owed him for work.” Sanhedrin 57a.
"If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite...the payment is to be in full." Baba Kamma 37b.
“If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile ("heathen") it does not have to be returned. “ Baba Mezia 24a and Baba Kamma 113b.
“God will not spare a Jew who marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a gentile.” Sanhedrin 76a.
“When a Jew murders a gentile, there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.” Sanhedrin 57a.
“The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has exposed their money to Israel.” Baba Kamma 37b.
“Jews may use lies ("subterfuges") to circumvent a gentile.” Baba Kamma 113a.
“All gentile children are animals.” Yebamoth 98a.
“Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.” Abodah Zarah 36b.
“Gentiles prefer sex with cows.” Abodah Zarah 22a-22b.
“A Jewish man must prayer every day: Thank you God for not making me a gentile, a woman or a slave.” Menahoth 43b-44a.
“This is the saying of Rabbi Simon ben Yohai ‘Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed’”. Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10.
"For it is said, 'And ye my sheep, the sheep of my pasture, are human (Adam), you are called human beings (Adam) but the gentiles are not called human (Adam)." Yebamoth 61a.
[9] The concept of a “chosen people” is incompatible with the notion of the universality of God. If God is a universal condition, then no people is chosen, and this was the original appeal of Christianity, all are the “sons and daughters of God.” On the contrary, all the actions of “God” in the Torah clearly show him to be a tribal divinity with globalist ambitions. Let us note that from the point of view of the Torah and of Talmudic Judaism, the Pauline version of Christianity is a form of “idolatry,” a point of view that it shares with Islam, the third and last of the Semitic religions.
[10] Let us note that Paul never met the Nazarene and dissociated himself from his direct disciples. In Galatians Paul boasts that he received his teaching from no man but by direct inspiration from a Jesus who was no longer alive to correct him. Despite the fact that Paul’s writings appear after the Gospels in the by direct inspiration from a Jesus who was no longer alive to correct him. Despite the fact that Paul’s writings appear after the Gospels in the New Testament, all the Letters and Epistles attributed to him were in fact written long before the four Gospels themselves were written down. Nonetheless these gospels already existed and were transmitted through the direct disciples in oral form. It is significant, however, that nowhere in his writings does Paul ever refer to the direct teachings of Jesus given directly to the disciples, nowhere does he ever refer to or cite a saying in the Gospels and nowhere does he ever admit to the existence of this line of transmission.

Page 1 2 3 4 6 7

TOP