Submitting Your Writing

Fiction

Nonfiction

Poetry

Articles

Motion Picture Writing

Young Writers

HOME

Dethroning the Gods of the Religions, p. 6

Paul’s assault on man and on the universe was the tool with which he utterly devalues and nullifies all human achievements as products of the “flesh” and the “wisdom of the world.. Then comes the ultimate inversion borne of a psychology poisoned with resentment and revenge, it is the foolish and the weak who are truly great in the eyes of his authoritarian God and who will finally judge the world. In I Corinthians 1:20-28, he writes:

“Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? … But God has chosen the foolish things of the world to put to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to put to shame the things which are mighty. And the base things of the world and the things which are despised God has chosen, and the things which are not, to bring to nothing the things which are. That no flesh should glory in his presence.”

This Christianity thus requires the complete debasement of the world before the God of Paul and his band of “believers”, a God who is at war with all that is great and natural, who is afraid of both human intelligence and the body. Moreover, in order for this new Pauline Christianity to equip itself with the right to imperialist or worldwide domination, it had to present itself as an extension of Judaism notwithstanding the fact that the Nazarene had abrogated and rescinded the Mosaic law for his disciples on the premise of the all-sufficiency of the liberating force of love and the universality of the divine reality.

Therefore to the deviation of Paul was added yet another, the adoption and annexation by Christianity of the Torah, the Histories of the Kings of Israel and the Prophetic Books - all of which make up the Old Testament - with a view to establishing the belief that the God of Jesus was identical to the one and only God of the Jews and that he was their promised Messiah who would deliver the world from evil and place it under the subjugation of the “chosen people,” which of course was now to be the Christians with the Messiah at their head.

The monotheistic religions, ruled by jealous Gods who have declared the nonexistence of all other Gods, have cut man off from the universe which they demonize and calumniate. By such cunning man in his natural state has been made something deformed and loathsome; he has been made sick and despicable to himself. Obedience and belief are his only redemption from guilt for all clever parasites and impotent usurpers know that the reign of God requires that man must first be broken, filled with self-hatred and put in chains. All Semitic religions live under the curse of Adam; from his very birth man feels himself guilty and cursed for a crime by an alleged ancestor against God whose prophets, priests and “holy books” have imputed to all his descendants. Even modern courts are more sane: no one throws an entire family and that family’s family ad infinitum into jail because the father allegedly committed a crime [11].

The emergence in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries of technocratic civilization hostile to nature and to life was possible thanks to a single event which was its necessary precursor: the desacralization of the universe and the deprecation and depopulation of the Gods of nature by the monotheisms. For since the Gods of nature posed unseemly competition to the fatuous Semitic Gods drunk with unlimited vanity, nature and all that is natural must be slandered, held up with suspicion and dominated. Hence the screaming hysteria and manic paranoia of the Semitic traditions in the face of all the paganisms, the “heathens” and the “idolaters” of antiquity. Hence the opposition of the natural and the supernatural, the vilification of the first and the exaltation of the second.

In the war against the universe God becomes the enemy of all that is natural, of the inherent joy of existence. The consequence of this was twofold: on the one hand it allowed for unlimited blind intervention in the natural order and on the other hand it cut man off from the universal powers and hence his enfeeblement, his enslavement and progressive psychological deterioration.

Technocratic civilization dispenses with the religious Gods even while benefiting from the legacy of their hostility to nature and their assault on the natural. It takes up and carries forward to its final conclusion the priest’s method of degenerating and taming man: completely destroy man’s link to nature - which always remains the only hope for his freedom and independence from the collectivist man-made world - and destroy nature itself in the name of his economic improvement.

It must be asked: how could the industrialist purveyors of our modern environmental crisis not really understand the suicidal nature of the path they have chosen? How could they flout the biological fact that every organism survives only because it has achieved an equilibrium with its environment and no organism survives by progressively degrading its environment? Why are they apparently not concerned with providing a world that their children and grand children can live in?

The priests of modern science propound the dogma of the chemical nature of all life. Armed with this article of faith, our industrialist parasites see no end to economic power. Profit by destroying nature and then profit again by giving nature back to man in the form of a chemically synthesized world. In such a world man is wholly controllable and manipulable with no possibility of escape. In the moribund world of the machine as projected in modern science-fiction where computers, metal and plastics constitute man’s sole environment and in which laboratory structured chemicals have become man’s food, he is a husbanded animal to be identified by a control number and whose every brain modulation is the provenance of the priests of chemistry.
____________________________
[11] According to some, the fact that no parents have to teach their children to lie or to misbehave is proof of the congenital nature of “original sin.” Although a complete refutation of this thesis would be too much of a digression, it can be shown not only that “correct behavior” is an arbitrary man-made convention but also that the tendency of children to lie derives from their sense of helplessness and the need to conform in order to survive in the context of the authoritarian family structure founded on the controlling obedientialist values of reward and punishment.

Page 1 2 3 4 5 7

TOP